Captive Insurance Buyer Beware
By
Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC
Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness
Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC
Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness
Is a captive insurance cell the way to go? - Accounting
Today - Captive Insurance: Achieve large tax and cost reductions by renting a
“CAPTIVE”. Most accountants and small business owners are unfamiliar with a
great way to reduce taxes and expenses. By either creating or sharing “a
captive insurance company”, substantial tax and cost savings will benefit the
small business owner.
Today - Captive Insurance: Achieve large tax and cost reductions by renting a
“CAPTIVE”. Most accountants and small business owners are unfamiliar with a
great way to reduce taxes and expenses. By either creating or sharing “a
captive insurance company”, substantial tax and cost savings will benefit the
small business owner.
Over 80% of Fortune 500 companies take advantage of
some kind of captive insurance company arrangement. They set up their own
insurance companies to provide coverage when they think outside insurers are
charging too much, or coverage is simply unavailable. The parent company
creates a captive so that it has a self-financing option for buying insurance.
The captive then either retains the risk of providing insurance or pays
reinsurers (companies that reinsure insurers) to take the risk.
If you buy insurance from a standard insurance company, your money buys a
service, but the money is spent and gone forever. When you utilize or “rent a
captive”, your money buys a service but it is invested with a good possibility
of a return.
In the event of a claim, the company pays claims from its captive or from its
reinsurer. To keep costs down, captives are often based in places where there
is favorable tax treatment and less onerous regulation (i.e. Vermont, South
Carolina, and Bermuda).
Optimum utilization of a captive by a small business, medical practice, or
professional.
The best way for a small business, medical practice, etc., to take advantage of
captive benefits is to share or rent a large captive. You can significantly
decrease your costs of insurance and obtain tax deductions at the same time.
There are, as well, significant tax advantages to renting a large captive as
opposed to owning a captive.
The advantages of “renting a captive” become apparent when you consider that
the single parent captive may be forced to use less than adequate standards or
marginal service so they can meet the financial requirements associated with
the initial general licensing and administrative costs of establishment.
Additionally, when renting a large captive, the captive bears the burden of
initial capital commitment and protects reinsurers from runaway claims and
unnecessary losses through their underwriting protocols and claims management
practices, all at significant savings to the small business owner.
Other advantages include low policy fees and no capital responsibilities to
meet solvency requirements or annual management and maintenance costs. By
renting a large captive, you only pay a pro rata fee to cover all
administrative expenses for the captive insurance company. Another significant
advantage of renting a large captive is the ability to take a loan. It is
illegal for an individual captive to make loans to subscribers. When renting a
large captive, however, the individual subscriber has no ownership interest,
and this difference makes it legal for a rented captive to make loans to
individual subscribers. So you can make a tax deductible contribution, and then
take back money tax free. Operation of an individual stand alone captive
insurance company may not achieve the type of cost savings that a small
business could obtain by renting a large captive. To rent a large captive, your
company simply fills out some forms. Renting a captive requires no significant
financial commitment beyond the payment of premiums.
Buyer Beware
As with many strategies to enjoy tax savings and advantages, you must to do
this correctly. IRS and other problems have happened, in the past, to those
that have done this improperly or abusively. You probably want to work with a
large captive that already has over fifty million in assets and is being rented
by at least 200 different companies. Also, you’ll not want to own or control
any part of the captive. As an unrelated party, you can more likely
significantly decrease your cost of insurance, eliminate capital requirements,
and minimize maintenance costs.
You want to deal with a large captive that meets the risk shifting requirements
of IRS Revenue Ruling 2005-40. Be cautious about setting up your own small
captive. In addition to all the costs, a small captive may find that the
expense of defending itself from regulatory oversight is much greater than any
benefits received.
Lance Wallach, National Society of
Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching
professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters,
financial, international tax, and estate planning. He writes about
412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more
than ten conventions annually, writes for more than 50 publications, is quoted
regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial
talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and
others. Lance has written numerous books including “Protecting Clients from
Fraud, Incompetence and Scams,” published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk
Education’s “CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift
Taxation,” as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including “Avoiding
Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.” He
does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at
516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.
some kind of captive insurance company arrangement. They set up their own
insurance companies to provide coverage when they think outside insurers are
charging too much, or coverage is simply unavailable. The parent company
creates a captive so that it has a self-financing option for buying insurance.
The captive then either retains the risk of providing insurance or pays
reinsurers (companies that reinsure insurers) to take the risk.
If you buy insurance from a standard insurance company, your money buys a
service, but the money is spent and gone forever. When you utilize or “rent a
captive”, your money buys a service but it is invested with a good possibility
of a return.
In the event of a claim, the company pays claims from its captive or from its
reinsurer. To keep costs down, captives are often based in places where there
is favorable tax treatment and less onerous regulation (i.e. Vermont, South
Carolina, and Bermuda).
Optimum utilization of a captive by a small business, medical practice, or
professional.
The best way for a small business, medical practice, etc., to take advantage of
captive benefits is to share or rent a large captive. You can significantly
decrease your costs of insurance and obtain tax deductions at the same time.
There are, as well, significant tax advantages to renting a large captive as
opposed to owning a captive.
The advantages of “renting a captive” become apparent when you consider that
the single parent captive may be forced to use less than adequate standards or
marginal service so they can meet the financial requirements associated with
the initial general licensing and administrative costs of establishment.
Additionally, when renting a large captive, the captive bears the burden of
initial capital commitment and protects reinsurers from runaway claims and
unnecessary losses through their underwriting protocols and claims management
practices, all at significant savings to the small business owner.
Other advantages include low policy fees and no capital responsibilities to
meet solvency requirements or annual management and maintenance costs. By
renting a large captive, you only pay a pro rata fee to cover all
administrative expenses for the captive insurance company. Another significant
advantage of renting a large captive is the ability to take a loan. It is
illegal for an individual captive to make loans to subscribers. When renting a
large captive, however, the individual subscriber has no ownership interest,
and this difference makes it legal for a rented captive to make loans to
individual subscribers. So you can make a tax deductible contribution, and then
take back money tax free. Operation of an individual stand alone captive
insurance company may not achieve the type of cost savings that a small
business could obtain by renting a large captive. To rent a large captive, your
company simply fills out some forms. Renting a captive requires no significant
financial commitment beyond the payment of premiums.
Buyer Beware
As with many strategies to enjoy tax savings and advantages, you must to do
this correctly. IRS and other problems have happened, in the past, to those
that have done this improperly or abusively. You probably want to work with a
large captive that already has over fifty million in assets and is being rented
by at least 200 different companies. Also, you’ll not want to own or control
any part of the captive. As an unrelated party, you can more likely
significantly decrease your cost of insurance, eliminate capital requirements,
and minimize maintenance costs.
You want to deal with a large captive that meets the risk shifting requirements
of IRS Revenue Ruling 2005-40. Be cautious about setting up your own small
captive. In addition to all the costs, a small captive may find that the
expense of defending itself from regulatory oversight is much greater than any
benefits received.
Lance Wallach, National Society of
Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching
professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters,
financial, international tax, and estate planning. He writes about
412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more
than ten conventions annually, writes for more than 50 publications, is quoted
regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial
talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and
others. Lance has written numerous books including “Protecting Clients from
Fraud, Incompetence and Scams,” published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk
Education’s “CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift
Taxation,” as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including “Avoiding
Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.” He
does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at
516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.
The information provided herein is not intended as legal,
accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or
other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such
advice.
accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or
other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such
advice.
While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy
of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual
situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer.
For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related
topics, please contact the author.
of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual
situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer.
For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related
topics, please contact the author.
audits of 419e and 412i plans, 6707A, listed and reportable transactions,Section 79, captive insurance and abusive tax shelters
ReplyDeleteMenuSkip to content
Home
About
CALL NOW 516-938-5007 FOR FREE 5MIN TELEPHONE CONSULTATION WITH LANCE WALLACH!!
Please click here to Contact Mr. Wallach.
OUR MESSAGE FORUM:
Free Online ForumClick here to enter our Message Forum
Subscribe to via Email
LANCE WALLACH, LLC
63 Keswick Lane
Plainview NY, 11803
526-938-5007
M-F 8am-8pm
Search
ARCHIVES
CATEGORIES
FANPAGE
TWITTER
Follow me @LanceWallach
MONTHLY ARCHIVES: FEBRUARY 2014
Who Should Engage in Asset Protection?
FEBRUARY 24, 2014
Asset protection is a legal method of reducing your exposure to various types of risks by placing assets into various protected structures. In addition, these structures are typically organized in a manner to minimize the negative impact of a particular event. For example, did you ever wonder why both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have bottling divisions? It minimizes liability. If there is a problem with the physical product, the bottling division will be the target of litigation. However, the intellectual property is owned by a separate structure keeping out of the defendant’s chair if the bottling division is sued. However, all businesses should consider their actual structure from the perspective of being potential litigation, which is the essence of asset protection.
In general, there are two negative situations asset protection seeks to minimize. The first is bankruptcy. Here, planners work with the bankruptcy code to help clients survive bankruptcy. However, it’s important to realize there is only so much a planner can do in this area. The bankruptcy code exemptions are very clear — and also fairly limited. The second negative event planners work at minimizing is litigation. Here we have far more flexibility (so long as there are no fraudulent transfer issues). By using various structures, it is possible to greatly reduce the negative impact of litigation. Other events that are considered in the plan are divorce (both of the client and the client’s children) death (but this falls more under estate planning) and incapacitation.
It’s also important to understand what asset protection isn’t. Asset protection cannot create a bullet proof strategy that is unassailable in all situations – and don’t let anyone tell you differently. The most striking example is bankruptcy; as mentioned above, the bankruptcy exemptions are very clear and very narrow; anything that falls outside them is swept up in the bankruptcy estate to pay creditors. In addition, if a person does not maintain the plan, trouble can emerge. For example, a person that forms a corporation that does not keep up with corporate formalities could have the court “pierce the corporate veil,” meaning the person will become personally liable for the claim.
Who Should Engage in Asset Protection?
All businesses should have an attorney who specializes in asset protection look at the overall business structure at least once every few years to make sure their overall structure provides maximum protection. In addition, all high net worth individuals (people with at least $1 million in net worth) should have a plan in place, as their wealth is a natural litigation target. There are also several professions that naturally benefit from asset protection planning. Doctors lead the pack, followed closely by other licensed professionals (accountants, lawyers and engineers etc..).
Lance Wallach
68 Keswick Lane
Plainview, NY 11803
Ph.: (516)938-5007
Fax: (516)938-6330 www.vebaplan.com
National Society of Accountants Speaker of The Year
The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.
Posted in Expert Witness, finance, forum, Insurance, law, legal, life insurance. Tagged business, Estate, estate planning, Fraudulent Transfer Issues, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness. Edit
audits of 419e and 412i plans, 6707A, listed and reportable transactions,Section 79, captive insurance and abusive tax shelters
ReplyDeleteMenuSkip to content
Home
About
CALL NOW 516-938-5007 FOR FREE 5MIN TELEPHONE CONSULTATION WITH LANCE WALLACH!!
Please click here to Contact Mr. Wallach.
OUR MESSAGE FORUM:
Free Online ForumClick here to enter our Message Forum
Subscribe to via Email
LANCE WALLACH, LLC
63 Keswick Lane
Plainview NY, 11803
526-938-5007
M-F 8am-8pm
Search
ARCHIVES
CATEGORIES
FANPAGE
TWITTER
Follow me @LanceWallach
MONTHLY ARCHIVES: FEBRUARY 2014
Who Should Engage in Asset Protection?
FEBRUARY 24, 2014
Asset protection is a legal method of reducing your exposure to various types of risks by placing assets into various protected structures. In addition, these structures are typically organized in a manner to minimize the negative impact of a particular event. For example, did you ever wonder why both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have bottling divisions? It minimizes liability. If there is a problem with the physical product, the bottling division will be the target of litigation. However, the intellectual property is owned by a separate structure keeping out of the defendant’s chair if the bottling division is sued. However, all businesses should consider their actual structure from the perspective of being potential litigation, which is the essence of asset protection.
In general, there are two negative situations asset protection seeks to minimize. The first is bankruptcy. Here, planners work with the bankruptcy code to help clients survive bankruptcy. However, it’s important to realize there is only so much a planner can do in this area. The bankruptcy code exemptions are very clear — and also fairly limited. The second negative event planners work at minimizing is litigation. Here we have far more flexibility (so long as there are no fraudulent transfer issues). By using various structures, it is possible to greatly reduce the negative impact of litigation. Other events that are considered in the plan are divorce (both of the client and the client’s children) death (but this falls more under estate planning) and incapacitation.
It’s also important to understand what asset protection isn’t. Asset protection cannot create a bullet proof strategy that is unassailable in all situations – and don’t let anyone tell you differently. The most striking example is bankruptcy; as mentioned above, the bankruptcy exemptions are very clear and very narrow; anything that falls outside them is swept up in the bankruptcy estate to pay creditors. In addition, if a person does not maintain the plan, trouble can emerge. For example, a person that forms a corporation that does not keep up with corporate formalities could have the court “pierce the corporate veil,” meaning the person will become personally liable for the claim.
Who Should Engage in Asset Protection?
All businesses should have an attorney who specializes in asset protection look at the overall business structure at least once every few years to make sure their overall structure provides maximum protection. In addition, all high net worth individuals (people with at least $1 million in net worth) should have a plan in place, as their wealth is a natural litigation target. There are also several professions that naturally benefit from asset protection planning. Doctors lead the pack, followed closely by other licensed professionals (accountants, lawyers and engineers etc..).
Lance Wallach
68 Keswick Lane
Plainview, NY 11803
Ph.: (516)938-5007
Fax: (516)938-6330 www.vebaplan.com
National Society of Accountants Speaker of The Year
The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.
Posted in Expert Witness, finance, forum, Insurance, law, legal, life insurance. Tagged business, Estate, estate planning, Fraudulent Transfer Issues, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness. Edit
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
ReplyDeleteTax Audit Experts - Don't Write That Big IRS Check Yet!
Tax Audit Experts - Don't Write That Big IRS Check Yet!
Posted by lance wallach at 6:06 AM